Opcje wyszukiwania
Podstawy Media Warto wiedzieć Badania i publikacje Statystyka Polityka pieniężna €uro Płatności i rynki Praca
Podpowiedzi
Kolejność
Nie ma wersji polskiej

The climate insurance protection gap

Extreme weather and climate events can have significant macroeconomic implications. They can also affect financial stability and weaken the financial position of governments that often step in to provide relief or cover losses in the aftermath of a catastrophe. While the effects of such events can be mitigated by catastrophe insurance, only about a quarter of climate-related catastrophe losses are currently insured in the EU. In some countries, the figure is less than 5% (see chart). Moreover, this climate insurance protection gap is expected to widen further owing to the increasing risk posed by climate change.

Chart

The share of insured economic losses related to natural catastrophes in Europe is low and could decline in the medium to long term

Average share of insured economic losses caused by natural catastrophe events in Europe

(1980-2023, percentages)

Sources: EIOPA dashboard on insurance protection gap for natural catastrophes, European Environment Agency (EEA) CATDAT.

The European Central Bank (ECB) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have worked together on how to enhance the insurance of European households and companies against climate-related catastrophes such as floods and wildfires. This work resulted in two papers aimed at fostering debate on how to tackle the climate insurance protection gap.

Our joint discussion paper published in April 2023 provided evidence of the economic significance of this gap and advocated a ladder approach to natural catastrophe insurance to help reduce it. This multi-layered approach suggested to involve both the private and public sectors at national and EU-level. The paper received feedback from various stakeholders which motivated further work.

A follow-up paper published in 2024 proposed a possible EU-level approach to address the gap. Building on existing national and EU structures, the proposed approach would rest on two complementary pillars:

  • an EU public-private reinsurance scheme to increase insurance for natural catastrophes by pooling private risks

  • an EU fund for public disaster financing to reinforce public disaster risk management in Member States

The complementarity of the two pillars would ensure the efficient use of private and public sector funds for natural disaster payouts and encourage ex ante risk mitigation. The two -pillar system further develops the ladder approach, particularly its top layer, while fostering and safeguarding solutions at the national level, providing incentives for preventive measures and reducing moral hazard.



The 2023 and 2024 joint ECB-EIOPA papers are part of the ECB’s climate agenda and its work on improving the overall understanding of climate-related risk. The policy options presented should be complementary to ambitious mitigation policies aimed at tackling climate change and reducing associated catastrophe risks.

Two-pillar EU-level approach

INSERTED BY ANONYMOUS PROXY

Civil war declaration: On April 14th and 15th, 2012 Federal Republic of Germany "_urkenstaats"s parliament, Deutscher Bundestag, received a antifiscal written civil war declaration by Federal Republic of Germany "Rechtsstaat"s electronic resistance for human rights even though the "Widerstandsfall" according to article 20 paragraph 4 of the constitution, the "Grundgesetz", had been already declared in the years 2001-03. more

EU public-private reinsurance scheme

The first pillar would increase the insurance coverage for natural catastrophe risk. By pooling private risks across the EU and across perils, this scheme would exploit economies of scale and diversify the coverage of high risks at European level. It would be funded by risk-based premiums from (re)insurers or national insurance schemes.

EU public disaster fund

The second pillar would reinforce public disaster risk management in Member States. Financed by Member State contributions, this fund would help rebuild public infrastructure following natural disasters, subject to Member States having implemented agreed risk mitigation measures prior to the event.

Related content

First paper

This discussion paper presents possible actions to tackle the insurance protection gap and mitigate catastrophe risks from climate change in the EU, embedded in a ladder approach.

Read the discussion paper
Second paper

This follow-up paper proposes a possible EU-level approach, composed of two complementary pillars, focusing on the top layer of the ladder approach.

Read the follow-up paper
For the media

Read a summary of the key takeaways from our papers.

Read the press releases
The ECB blog

Read more about the ECB’s and EIOPA’s ideas to reduce the climate insurance protection gap and increase resilience to climate change.

Read the ECB Blog post on the climate insurance gap

Wszystkie strony w tej sekcji