This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52011AB0008
Opinion of the European Central Bank of 11 February 2011 on a recommendation for a Council decision on arrangements for the renegotiation of the Monetary Agreement with the Principality of Monaco (CON/2011/8)
Opinion of the European Central Bank of 11 February 2011 on a recommendation for a Council decision on arrangements for the renegotiation of the Monetary Agreement with the Principality of Monaco (CON/2011/8)
Opinion of the European Central Bank of 11 February 2011 on a recommendation for a Council decision on arrangements for the renegotiation of the Monetary Agreement with the Principality of Monaco (CON/2011/8)
OJ C 60, 25.2.2011, p. 1–2
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
25.2.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 60/1 |
OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK
of 11 February 2011
on a recommendation for a Council decision on arrangements for the renegotiation of the Monetary Agreement with the Principality of Monaco
(CON/2011/8)
2011/C 60/01
Introduction and legal basis
On 9 February 2011, the European Central Bank (ECB) received a request from the Council of the European Union for an opinion on a recommendation for a Council decision on arrangements for the renegotiation of the Monetary Agreement with the Principality of Monaco (1) (hereinafter ‘the draft decision’).
The ECB’s competence to deliver an opinion is based on Article 219(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. In accordance with the first sentence of Article 17.5 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Central Bank, the Governing Council has adopted this opinion.
General observations
The ECB welcomes the draft decision, which more than 10 years after the introduction of the euro, aims at amending the Monetary Agreement with the Principality of Monaco with a view to ensuring a more consistent approach in relations between the Union and third countries.
In particular, the ECB welcomes the new revised method for calculating the ceiling of issuance of Monaco euro coins and setting the minimum proportion of Monegasque euro coins to be put into circulation at face value at 80 %.
The ECB notes, however, that the terminology used in the draft decision — and consequently also in the monetary agreement — should be adjusted in view of legislative developments.
Where the ECB recommends that the proposed decision is amended, specific drafting proposals are set out in the Annex accompanied by explanatory text to this effect.
Done at Frankfurt am Main, 11 February 2011.
The Vice-President of the ECB
Vítor CONSTÂNCIO
(1) COM(2011) 23 final.
ANNEX
Drafting proposals
Text proposed by the Commission |
Amendments proposed by the ECB (1) |
||||
Amendment 1 |
|||||
Article 2(a) |
|||||
|
|
||||
Explanation Since one of the purposes of renegotiating the Agreement with Monaco is to ensure a more consistent approach with other monetary agreements, the ECB advises using the same wording used in the monetary agreement with the Vatican City State (signed on 17 December 2009 (2)) with regard to the role of the ECB. Furthermore, the proposed wording is consistent with Article 9 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001 of 28 June 2001 laying down measures necessary for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (3), which provides that the Commission shall cooperate with non-member countries and international organisations in close association with the European Central Bank. |
|||||
Amendment 2 |
|||||
Article 2(b) |
|||||
|
|
||||
Explanation The ECB considers it important to use precise monetary law terminology in the mandate and subsequently in the monetary agreement itself. More specifically, the conclusions of a report prepared by a working group consisting of representatives from Ministries of Finance and national central banks of the euro area (the euro legal tender working group) must be duly reflected, by distinguishing between ‘putting into circulation’ (4) and ‘issuance’ of euro coins (5). |
(1) Bold in the body of the text indicates where the ECB proposes inserting new text. Strikethrough in the body of the text indicates where the ECB proposes deleting text.
(4) Putting into circulation is a purely operational and physical activity and can be delegated to an agent.
(5) Issuance as a whole, including both putting into circulation and entering into the balance sheet of the issuing authority, is an act of public authority and cannot be outsourced.